Wednesday, 5 November 2008

Tories for Obama - and Palin!

Flip- Flop-Flip. Louise Bagshawe has already got the Tory lines up and running.

It goes something like this:
- They wanted McCain to win, so are pretty gutted.
- She's delighted at Obama's victory at the same time, as its good news for the Tories.
- But she can't wait to get behind the Palin campaign in 2012.

This must be what they call Tory means to progressive goals (or is it the other way round; nobody can ever quite remember).

"They can have a previous president. We'll have the next one", senior Conservatives briefed gloatingly of David Cameron's decision to invite John McCain to the 2006 Tory party conference.

David Cameron may have got closer to John McCain than any other international politician, pretty much endorsing McCain as his favoured candidate for the White House as the primary season began.

But, by this morning, he will be renewing his enthusiasm for Barack Obama by the morning. I was pretty sceptical about this when he first tried it at the start of the primaries almost a year ago, suggesting David Cameron might struggle to capture the excitement and sense of change. Perhaps he could steal this Obama line:


"The day I'm inaugurated, not only will the country look at itself differently, but the world will look at America differently."


Or perhaps not.

Related Posts by Categories



Widget by Hoctro | Jack Book

1 comments:

Robert said...

There has been plenty of Tory flip-flopping on display this week.

Take their health team's dismal response to Alan Johnson's astute line on the thorny NHS co-payments issue yesterday.

Is it just me or is this this response from Andrew Lansley both a distortion and rather Janus-faced?

Lansley said: "We have consistently argued that it is morally wrong for patients to have their NHS care taken away from them if they choose to pay for part of their treatment."

But he added: "They've gone from letting patients lose their NHS care to creating a two-tier NHS, where some patients will get better care simply because they can pay for it. And they're trying to dress it up by calling it 'separate' care."

In the debate following his statement, Alan blasted the "weird and wonderful" contortions of his opposite number. And he later dismissed the histrionics of one hapless Tory MP as "an audition for the Royal Shakespeare Company" - which he would treat "with the contempt it deserves".

Welcome

Welcome to the Next Left blog from the Fabian Society. We have been writing about policies and politics since the late 19th century. Now we are firmly in the 21st century, starting debates that matter today. As with all Fabian publications, posts on Next Left represent the views of their individual authors, not the collective view of the Fabian Society as a whole.

Submit an idea for a blog post?
If you have got an idea, why not drop us a line with a 50 word pitch. It should not have been published previously and should fit with the Next Left ethos.
Email
The Next Left editors at
editor1@nextleft.org
editor2@nextleft.org
editor3@nextleft.org

Search Next Left

Loading...

Blog Archive

Join the Fabians
Fabian Society podcasts
Contact the Fabian Society Fabian Society events
A Fabian Society blog